[PhillyOnRails] PhillyOnRails Rubyforge Project, Started!

[Ron Lusk]

Can I suggest using
Hoe<http://rubyforge.org/frs/shownotes.php?group_id=1513&release_id=8918>for
releases?  I haven't done anything for Rubyforge, but I use it for my
internal gems.

On 2/6/07, Mat Schaffer <schapht at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 6, 2007, at 2:54 PM, Mark Chadwick wrote:
>
> I propose to keep things semi-organized in svn, we use the kind of
> organization found in Pragmatic Version Control (
> http://www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/titles/svn/ ) ...or at least follow the
> projectname/trunk convention to keep it clean?  Thoughts?
>
> stolen from http://software.pmade.com/svnauto/pages/show/Manual
>
>
> This is definitely a good way to do things.  But I think if people want to
> have their own systems in their own sub-projects that's fine too.  I don't
> want to stifle creativity on account of textbook SCM practices.  But now may
> be a good time to start brainstorming ground rules.  Here's how I'd draft
> them:
>
> 1. Create a directory in subversion with your sub-project name before
> comitting any new projects
>   (e.g., The 'texas holdem' project would go into
> 'svn://rubyforge.org/var/svn/phillyonrails/texasholdem'
>
> 2. Be _very_ careful when releasing gems.  Once a gem is released it
> will propagate to mirror servers.  Choose a good name and respect your
> users.
>
> 3. Our homepage points to http://www.phillyonrails.org/community/Projects,
> use this wiki for project information.
>
> -Mat
>
> _______________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
> http://lists.phillyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
>


-- 
Ron Lusk
ronlusk at alum.mit.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.phillyonrails.org/pipermail/talk/attachments/20070207/4bae8c8e/attachment.html